A reader of my blog has asked me to talk about my research interests. I will break it down to three major areas: physics, biology and economics. For this entry, I will talk about physics, as the tools I use to study the other two came from this one.
My doctorate is in the field of physics, more accurately, theoretical astrophysics and cosmology. My PhD thesis is on alternative cosmologies, where I look at some alternative theories to the mainstream big bang cosmology. The most important part of my thesis is to look for signatures of extra dimensions in the cosmic microwave background (the remnant 3K radiation left over after the big bang after the expansion of the universe). I belong to the group of physicists who believe that experiments are necessary drivers to good theories. Currently, string theorists have an elegant theory known as M-theory that may possibly unify the four forces of nature, namely electromagnetic, gravity and nuclear (strong and weak). However, there is no experimental evidence to give some indication that the theory is correct. For that matter, we have not found the Higgs boson, the last of the 18 particles that is predicted by standard model in particle physics.
The only important result that I did for my PhD thesis and it is perhaps a small and modest contribution is to produce how the tensor anisotropies [1] (in layman, perturbations that relates to the gravitational waves) can be modified by theories of extra dimensions. In fact, if you check the references that cites my paper, it is recently brought up in a review for the PLANCK project, which actually details the efforts of the European Space Agency on the new satellite which they will be sending up to space in 2008/2009. My thesis supervisor, Professor Anthony Lasenby is one of the key players to this project.
After that, I spent a year trying to find a postdoctoral position to do something different, because I was wondering whether my field is too saturated. Perhaps, like in the tradition of Crick and Watson, Black and Scholes, I should go into another field and contribute. So, I did some work in economics and subsequently move into computational biology, but specializing in mainly on the human genome project. While I was looking for my next move, I wrote a paper with William Saslaw to resolve the paradox on the "coldness" of the Hubble Flow and provided some idea on how to calculate binding energy distribution for galaxies. One of my NUS students is currently working with me on the followup to that paper. Using my theory, we showed that our results tally with an old experiment conducted by Garcia (1994) how the groups of galaxies are distributed in our Universe.
I was lucky to do my PhD research in the famous Cavendish Laboratory. For those who do not know, it is where the nuclear atom is split (Ruthorford) and the structure of the DNA is discovered (Crick and Watson).
References:
[1] Bernard Leong, Anthony Challinor, Roy Maartens and Anthony Lasenby, "Braneworld Tensor Anisotropies in the CMB" astro-ph/0208015, Phys. Rev. D66:104010, 2002. You check the citation thru one of the links and find the review paper on Planck.
[2] Bernard Leong and William Saslaw, "Gravitation Binding, Virialization and the Peculiar Velocity Distribution of the Galaxies", ApJ, 608:636-646, 2004.
Recent Comments